1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 658 of 2023 • Bisram S/o Late Ramhu Satnami Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Sehradabri, Tahsil And District Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Bhagchand S/o Late Gopi By Caste Satnami Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Seheradbri, Tahsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 2. Kishore S/o Late Gopi, By Caste Satnami Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Seheradbri, Tahsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 3. Gayatri Bai D/o Late Gopi, By Caste Satnami Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Seheradbri, Tahsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. Ghiri Bai W/o Late Gopi, By Caste Satnami Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Seheradbri, Tahsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. Ful Kunwar D/o Late Ramhu Satnami, W/o Purushottam Ratre, By Caste Satnami Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Seheradbri, Tahsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 6. Bisantin Bai D/o Late Ramhu, W/o Johan Chelak, Satnami, W/o Purushottam Ratre, By Caste Satnami Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Manchadur, Tahsil Charama, District Kanker (C.G.) 7. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector District Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For State/Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 14. 07.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there is no instruction on behalf of the petitioner in this matter. SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.07.14 18:31:33 +0530 2 2. Taking into consideration the submission advanced by Mr. Patel, it appears that petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter. Hence, present petition is hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive his prayer, if cause of action still survives. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant