Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30807 (KAR)

SMT MUNINARAYANAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/21515/2021 · 2025-06-25

M Nagaprasanna

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22370 WP No. 21515 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 21515 OF 2021 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. MUNINARAYANAMMA, W/O LATE A.MUNISWAMY, (EX. SERVICEMEN MILITARY) AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDENT OF NO.299, DODDATHOGUR VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, ELECTRONIC CITY POST, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 100. …PETITIONER (BY SRI T.N.VISWANATHA AND SRI T.N.RAMESH, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22370 WP No. 21515 of 2021 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 001. 5. SMT.YELLAMMA, W/O SRI. ANNAIAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. 6. SMT.MUNIYAMMA, D/O LATE ANNAIAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. 7. SMT.SAVITHA, D/O LATE HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS. 8. SRI. VENKATESH, S/O LATE HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS. 9. SMT.GOWRAMMA, D/O LATE ANNAIAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 10. SMT.M.PUSHPA, D/O SRI MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22370 WP No. 21515 of 2021 11. SMT.AISHWARAYA, D/O SRI. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS. 12. SRI. M.DASHRATH TENDULKAR, S/O MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT DODDA THOGURU VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK – 560 100. ALL ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SRI P.DEVARAJ, S/O LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SESHU V., HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-4; SRI R.BADRINATH, ADVOCATE FOR R-5 TO R-12) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 READ WITH ARTICLE 14 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO NOT TO CONSIDER THE LETTER DTD.17.9.2019 ISSUED BY THE SRI.M.KRISHNAPPA, MLA, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-R FOR GRANT OF LAND IN SY NO.105 OF DODDATHOGUR VILLAGE AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22370 WP No. 21515 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel Sri.T.N.Viswanatha appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject petition is rendered infructuous. Submission is placed on record. 2. Learned counsel representing the respondents submits that the petition may have to be kept pending for the reason that several documents that are annexed to this petition have been produced in the original suit. Therefore, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous and the Paper Book is directed to be kept below along with the pending companion petitions. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 3 Sl No.: 0