Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24077 RFA No. 1844 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1844 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
SMT. R.PADMAVATHI W/O VASU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.566, 1ST MAIN ROAD, DEVAPPA LAYOUT, RAMACHANDRAPURA JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 013. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAMAN.B.V., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
SMT. JAYAMMA W/O SHIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/A, DODDABOMMASANDRA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 097.
2.
SRI. C.KANIKRAJ S/O CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT C/O SUMANGALAMMA, W/O BASAVALINGAPPA, A.HARIJANA MAHILA SEVA SANGHA® A.K.COLONY, NEAR BUS STOP,
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24077 RFA No. 1844 of 2017
HESARAGHATTA, BANGALORE-560 088. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.G.SRIDHAR., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
R2-DISMISSED AGAINST APPEAL V/O DATED:13.07.2023)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. Sri.A.G.Sridhar., counsel for respondent No.1 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 03.01.2018, 30.06.2023 and 13.07.2023, on those days, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. The appeal is listed today. As already noted above, though matter called twice, today also there is no
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24077 RFA No. 1844 of 2017
representation on behalf of the appellant. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2017. Now we are in the month of July, 2025. The appeal is pending from eight years. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36