APHC010445272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23160/2025 Between: 1. KOMMIREDDY VEERA BHADRA RAO,, S/O. K. CHINNA NOOKARAJU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. THATIPATRI VILLAGE, PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PEDDAPURAM REVENUE DIVISION, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly a writ In the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioners Mee- sevaF-line Application No. FSNV012500724259 dt.04.05.2025to conduct survey and to mutate my name in the revenue records with regard to the subject landsin Sy.No. 192/1 admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.85 cents, Sy.No. 192/2 admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1.57 cents and Sy.No. 192/2 admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.60 centssituated at P. Jaggannadhapuram Village, Prathipadu Mandal, Kakinada District., as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the procedure established by law and in violation of articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of the India and consequently direct the respondents to consider petitioners Mee- sevaF-line Application No. FSNVOI2500724259 dt.04.05.2025to conduct survey and to mutate the petitioners name in the revenue records with regard to the subject lands in Sy.No.192/1 admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.85 cents, Sy.No. 192/2 admeasuring an extent of Ac. 2 1.57 cents and Sy.No. 192/2 admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.60 cents situated at P. Jaggannadhapuram Village, Prathipadu Mandal, Kakinada District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider petitioner’s Mee- sevaF-line Application No. FSNV012500724259 dt.04.05.2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NANI BABU ROBBA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23160 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “… to issue Writ or order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s Mee Seva F-line Application No.FSNV012500724259, dated 04.05.2025 to conduct survey and to mutate the name of petitioner in the revenue records with regard to the subject lands in Sy.No.192/1 admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.85 cents, Sy.No.192/2 admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.57 cents and Sy.No.192/2 admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.60 cents situated at P.Jagannadhapuram village, Prathipadu Mandal, Kakinada District as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s Mee Seva F-line application dated 04.05.2025 and pass such other order or orders.…” 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue furnished the proceedings dated 25.08.2025 addressed by the Tahsildar, Prathipadu. In that proceedings, it is clearly stated that the F-Line application dated 04.05.2025 filed by the petitioner, to conduct survey and fix the boundaries for the subject land, was rejected on the ground that the petitioner is not the pattadar of the said land. It is further contended that an appeal is provided under Section 11 of the A.P. Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and the petitioner may avail the same. 4 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to avail the remedy provided under Section 11 of the A.P. Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 02.09.2025 SJ 5 119 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23160 of 2025 Date : 02.09.2025 SJ