Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3080 (PAT)

Bipul Kumar @ Harsh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./81808/2025 · 2026-03-18

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81808 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-415 Year-2025 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Bipul Kumar @ Harsh Kumar S/O Sunil Kr Singh R/O Vill.- Karmakila, P.S- Barun Dist Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Shukla, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Shivam Gupta, Advocate : Mr. Tarun, Advocate : Mr. Animesh Gupta, Advocate : Mr. Saket Tiwary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 18-03-2026 Heard Mr. Ravindra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned APP as also Mr. Tarun, learned counsel representing the informant. 2. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 415 of 2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 108, 69, 308(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, lodged on 28.08.2025 by the informant Surbhi Kumari. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that she called the petitioner to 'Assi Ghat' Varanasi to inform that the parents have came to know about the relationship, there they remained in a hotel room and had relationship. The petitioner always assured of marriage but later wanted dowry and also threatened that he will commit suicide. The girl being aggrieved, tried to commit suicide but the family brought her to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81808 of 2025(3) dt.18-03-2026 2/2 Barun Health Center on 28.08.2025 for treatment which followed the F.I.R.. 4. The allegation is there against the petitioner, however, in view of the fact that he showed remorse and further wanted to tie nuptial knots, as the informant had put in her appearance, also considering that both are major and the relationship was consensual as also the petitioner was in custody since 29.08.2025, provisional bail was granted to him on 03.08.2025. 5. Today, on call, learned counsel for the informant submits though the affidavit could not be filed in the matter, it is instruction of the informant is that she having been traumatized earlier, is not ready to tie nuptial knots. 6. The allegation is there, the petitioner will face the music, as submitted, it was a consensual relationship between two adults, in that background, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner on 03.12.2025 stands confirmed. 7. The petition stands disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T