Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Tripura · body

2025 DAILYLAW 308 (TRI)

Indian Bank v. Smt. Nabanita Saha and 2 Others

WP(C)/657/2025 · 2026-04-23

T Amarnath Goud

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA W.P.(C) 657/2025 Indian Bank ----Petitioner(s) Versus Smt. Nabanita Saha & 2 ors. . ----Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Dr. DB Paul, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. P. Gautam, Sr. GA Mr. K. Datta, Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD Order 23/04/2026 When the matter is called upon, both sides are present. It is submitted that the present writ petition has been filed on the ground that an execution proceeding was pending before the District Consumer Redressal Commission, but the Commission was not functioning. Accordingly, the writ petition was preferred and on 05.12.2025 an interim order has been obtained by the petitioner in I.A.1 of 2025 in this writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondents have submitted that presently the State Commission is functioning and the execution proceeding (EA 10 of 2024) is listed on 28.04.2026. In view of the same, the instant writ petition is disposed of and closed directing the parties to the lis to approach the District Consumer Redressal Commission, West Tripura, for appropriate redressal. Interim order dated 05.12.2025 passed in I.A. 1 of 2025 stands vacated as a sequel. JUDGE SAIKAT KAR Digitally signed by SAIKAT KAR Date: 2026.04.23 16:29:44 -04'00'