SIMAN BASKEY @ SIMON BASKI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./871/2025 · 2025-03-12
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30798 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30798 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A No. 871 of 2025
1. Simon Baski @ Siman Baskey, aged about 41 years, Son of Mathin Baskey @ Marthin Baskey,
2. Ramu Marandi, aged about 57 years, Son of Charan Marandi
3. Filip Baskey, aged about 59 years, Son of Martin Baskey,
4. Sushanti Tudu @ Santina Tudu, aged about 35 years, Wife of Nikolas Soren @ Nilulas Soren
5. Sukurmuni Kisku, aged about 52 years, Wife of Gopal Tudu,
6. Dukhu Hembram, aged about 65 years, Son of Bhim Hembram and father-in-law of Ragat Murmu,
7. Sunil Hembram @ Dobe Hembram, aged about 35 years, Son of Dukhu Hembram, All are resident of Village- Bohra (Rassitola), P.O. P.S.- Maheshpur, District-Pakur (Jharkhand) --- Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand
---
--- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
---
For the Petitioners: Md. Faruque Ansari, Advocate
For the O.P-State: Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P. --- 03 / 12.03.2025 Heard the parties.
2. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with S.T. No. 131 of 2021 arising out of Amrapara P.S. Case No. 23 of 2021 for the offences registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 120B, 323, 307, 354B, 379, 380, 436, 456, 500, 506, 452 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Pakur.
3. Anticipatory bail application of the petitioners has been rejected by this court vide A.B.A. No. 8777 of 2022 by order dated 23.12.2022.
4. On 20.03.2021, petitioners along with co-accused persons went to the house of the Informant. They dragged her and her two daughters and disrobed them and paraded them naked. Accused persons also set the house of the Informant on fire and looted their valuables.
5. No fresh grounds have been made on behalf of the petitioners to reconsider their prayer for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected once again.
(Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded