[2025:RJ-JP:39152] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12112/2025 Chiranjilal S/o Dhannalal, R/o Near Dashera Makan, Janta Colony Niwai, Police Station Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.) ( At Present Lodge At District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12113/2025 Surgyan S/o Ramniwas, R/o Near Kali Ka Bag, Gurjaro Ka Mohallah, Newai, Police Station Newai City, District Tonk (Raj.) (Accused Petitioner In District Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudarshan Laddha, Mr. Sandeep Jain, Mr. Naman Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 23/09/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.67/2019 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 384, 506, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:39152] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12112/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter pertains to year 2019 and the investigation was kept pending against the petitioners under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C., thereafter, the police have arrested the petitioners. It is also contended that the other co-accused Sheojilal and Chhitarmal have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.12.2021 and 16.05.2025 respectively. The case of the petitioners is identical to the other co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail, therefore, these bail applications of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Chiranjilal S/o Dhannalal and 2. Surgyan S/o Ramniwas in connection with FIR No.67/2019 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District Bundi, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- [2025:RJ-JP:39152] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12112/2025] with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/211-212