Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30797 (PNJ)

SUKHDEEP KAUR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/5946/2025 · 2025-04-08

Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-5946-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5946-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.04.2025 Sukhdeep Kaur .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate,, for respondent-HUDA. *** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to decide her claim for allotment of plot under the oustees’ category. 2. As per the averments mentioned in the petition, Nachhtar Singh, father of the petitioner, had made a representation dated 15.10.2019 (Annexure P-9) to the competent authority for redressal of his grievance. After the death of said Nachhtar Singh, the petitioner has served a legal AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.28 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-5946-2025 (O&M) -2- notice dated 16.12.2024 (Annexure P-10) upon the respondents, but no action has been taken thereon till date. 3. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana and Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, for respondent-HUDA are present in Court. Learned counsel for respondent-HUDA submits that the said representation/legal notice shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Estate Officer, HUDA, Sector-7, Ambala (competent authority), to look into the pending representation dated 15.10.2019 (Annexure P-9) as well as the legal notice dated 16.12.2024 (Annexure P-10) and pass appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 08.04.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.28 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document