Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30795 (PAT)

Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./22205/2025 · 2025-04-21

Chandra Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22205 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== Rohit Kumar S/o- Sat Narain Prasad @ Satyanarayan Prasad Village- Satua Bazar, P.S.- Baniyapur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Krishna Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025 dated 10.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 21 litres of illicit country-made liquor was recovered from the motorcycle. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The seized motorcycle does not belong to the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22205 of 2025(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 11.02.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025. 7. The application stands allowed. shivam/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T