- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12498 RP No. 704 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REVIEW PETITION NO. 704 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI YOGANANDA H S S/O H B SHIVALINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDENT OF RAMASANDRA VILLAGE BAVANA FARM KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU-560060. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.K. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER BBMP HEAD OFFICE, N R SQUARE BENGALURU-560002. 2. JOINT COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE R R NAGAR SUB DIVISION RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR BENGALURU-560098. 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE R R NAGAR SUB DIVISION RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR BENGALURU-560098. 4. SRI C P DHANANJAYA S/O LATE R PUTTASWAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12498 RP No. 704 of 2022 NO.17 NEMMADI NILAYA 11TH CROSS BALAJI LAYOUT MALLATHAHALLI BENGALURU-560056. 5. SRI VIJAYA H K S/O H V KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS NO.70 SRI RANGA 10TH CROSS BALAJI LAYOUT MALLATHAHALLI BENGALURU-560056. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.M. VENKATA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. N. DINESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5) THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER HAS FILED THE ABOVE REVIEW PETITION UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT BE PLEASED TO A) ALLOW THE REVIEW PETITION. B)CALL FOR RECORDS IN W.P.NO.4807/2021 (LB-BMP) ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU.C) REVIEW OF THE ORDER DATED 21.07.2022 PASSED IN W.P.NO.4807/2021 (LB-BMP) AND MODIFY THE SAME.D) GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF/S THAT THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT AS ACCORDING TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The petitioner has sought for review of the order dated 21.07.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.4807 of 2021 (LB-BMP). - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12498 RP No. 704 of 2022 2. The sole contention of the petitioner in this review petition is that though the petitioner was arrayed as a party in Writ Petition No.4807 of 2021, the notice of the writ petition was not served on him and that the order dated 21.07.2022 was passed behind his back. 3. A perusal of the order dated 21.07.2022 shows that Respondent Nos.1 to 3 therein were directed to take suitable action, in accordance with law to clear the alleged encroachment of the road, after notifying the petitioner herein and after hearing him. The interest of the petitioner is sufficiently protected. Therefore, there is no error apparent on the face of record warranting review of the order dated 21.07.2022. Hence, the review petition is dismissed. In view of dismissal of the review petition, I.A.No.1 of 2022 also stands dismissed. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18