[2025:RJ-JP:39151] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14524/2025 Vinita Kumari D/o Omprakash, aged about 28 Years, R/o Khedi Dukya, Sikar, Distt. Sikar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Department Of Elementary Education Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director Elementary Education Department, Bikaner, Distt. Bikaner (Raj.) 3. The District Collector Ajmer, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) 4. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education Ajmer, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) 5. The Sub Divisional Officer cum Ex-Officio Electoral Registration Officer, Pushkar, Distt. Ajmer (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 23/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by an order dated 22.07.2025, passed by a Single Bench of this Court at the principal seat, Jodhpur, in a batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12975/2025: Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [2025:RJ-JP:39151] (2 of 2) [CW-14524/2025] 2. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be permitted to file a detailed representation before the respondent No.3-The District Collector, Ajmer for redressal of his grievances. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation in the office of respondent No.3 within a period of four (4) weeks from today and the respondent No.3 is directed to decide the same within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation; and if the case of the petitioner falls within the purview of the law laid down in the case of Ten Singh (supra); the same shall be decided in terms of the said judgment above. 4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition, and only if the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought. 5. All other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /16