1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No. 34202 of 2025 Dipak Ram Munda `…. Petitioner Represented by Mr. D.R.Bhokta, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha and Ors …. Opposite Parties Represented by A.S.C.. CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 13.3.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “In the facts and circumstances narrated above and in the interest of justice it is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to Issue Rule of Nisi calling upon the Opp. Party No. 3 to show cause as to why the Order No.03 of 2025 dt.12.11.2025 under Annexure-3 should not be quashed and if it fails to show cause or shows insufficient cause, make the Writ absolute by granting following reliefs by way of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ; I Quashing the Order No. 03 of 2025 dt. 12.11.2025 issued by the Opp. Party No.3 under Annexure-3 and directing him to consider the case of the Petitioner afresh in light of the Judgement dt. 23.08.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 27920 of 2023. 11. Directing the Opp. Party No 3 to register the land as per the sale deed. And pass such other order/orders, direction /directions as may be deemed fit and proper. Order No. 01. 2 | P a g e For this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall remain ever pray.” 3. It is submitted by the petitioner that his case is squarely covered by the ratio decided in the case of Hemanta Naik vrs. State of Odisha in W.P.(C). No. 27920 of 2023 and batch wherein a coordinate Bench of this Court held as follows: “18. In the result this court disposes of all the writ petitions granting liberty to each Petitioner to approach the competent Revenue Authority, i.e. concerned Tahasildar to give his opinion on the usability of the land and in such event the concerned Tahasildar is directed to give his opinion in respect of each specific land of respective Petitioners regarding its usability for agricultural purpose any more in the present scenario, within a period of 60 days from the date of application. Depending upon the opinion of the Revenue Authority, the Petitioners are at liberty to approach the registering officer again.” 4. Since the petitioner’s prayer is similar to the grievance of the petitioner in the batch of writ applications, the present writ application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Maneswar to consider the grievance of the petitioner in light of the judgment passed in Hemanta Naik (supra) within two months from today. The petitioner shall file a certified copy of this order and the aforementioned judgment before the Tahasildar. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge