Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30781 (BOM)

Union of India Through The General Manager Central Railway v. Sumitra Balkrishan Andhale

CA/13392/2024 · 2025-04-24

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

909.odt (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13392 OF 2024 IN FAST/29434/2024 Union Of India Through The General Manager Central Railway and Ors VERSUS Sumitra Balkrishan Andhale ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Ajay Gajanan Talhar Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.B. Solanke … CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : APRIL 24, 2025 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned advocates appearing for respective parties. 2. Applicants seek to condone delay of 871 days caused in filing appeal against judgment and award passed by the Reference Court under provisions of Land Acquisition Act. 3. Perused the application and reasons as stated therein. It appears that delay is occasioned on account of administrative exigencies and procedural aspects that require to be followed by applicants. No malafides are discernible in making delay. The applicants have not derived any advantage by making such delay. Contents of civil application are not controverted by respondents. In that view of matter, case is made out to condone the delay. 2025:BHC-AUG:11954 909.odt (2) 4. Hence, civil application is allowed. Delay of 871 days caused in filing appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered, subject to removal of office objections. (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) Mujaheed//