[2025:RJ-JP:1700] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 549/2025 Nandaram @ Nandlal S/o Shree Saudan, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Kosiyavas, P.s. Gegal District Ajmer (At Present In Judicial Custody In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.355/2023 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2024. Charge- sheet has been filed in this matter and trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Learned counsel further submits that it is also evident from the charge-sheet that neither any money was received by the petitioner in cash nor any money has been transferred in his account. [2025:RJ-JP:1700] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-549/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. He submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as 44 other cases have been registered against him. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in ten cases the petitioner has been acquitted by the learned trial court, which shows that the petitioner has been implicated in the false cases. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Nandaram @ Nandlal S/o Shree Saudan, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:1700] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-549/2025] 8. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in every week in the concerned police station. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J Sunita/344