Ramswaroop Bhuiya @ Ramswaroop Bhuiyan @ Ramswrup Bhuiya v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./75050/2025 · 2026-03-19
Sandeep Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3076 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3076 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75050 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2015 Thana- DUMARIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Ramswaroop Bhuiya @ Ramswaroop Bhuiyan @ Ramswrup Bhuiya S/O Late Kuleshwar Bhuiya R/O Vill.- Karhani,Kosla Tola, P.S- Dumariya,Dist- Gayaji ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyaya, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dumariya P.S. Case No. 12/2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 212, 216, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 353, 302, 332, 333, 435, 120(B), 379 of I.P.C., Section 27 of Arms Act and Sections 3/ 4/ 5 of Explosive Substance Act and under Sections 10, 11, 13(i), 13(ii) of U.A.P. Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, police constables of the cobra battalion and CRPF conducted a raid in the forest areas of Baghpur, Charakpur, Pananma Tand and Navigarh. Approximately 25 named accused and 90-100 unknown persons
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75050 of 2025(4) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 opened fire on the police party, who retaliated, though no casualties occurred.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned counsel further submits that he has no criminal antecedents in which he is on bail and he is in custody since 24.03.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner is a naxal.
6. Considering the fact that the petitioner is a naxal involved in firing upon the CRPF and other police personnel and the also the fact that the petitioner is an absconder, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T