Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30757 (KAR)

SRI P YOGARAJ v. SRI GURULINGAPPA

RSA/1778/2015 · 2025-03-20

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11546 RSA No. 1778 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1778 OF 2015 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI P YOGARAJ DEAD BY HIS LRS 1 SRI B MANOHAR DEAD BY HIS LRS 1(a) SMT CHANDRIKA, W/O LATE B MANOHAR, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 1(b) SRI B M CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O LATE M MANOHAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 1(c) SRI P Y NAGARAJ, S/O LATE P YOGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 1(d) SRI Y MANJUNATH, S/O LATE P YOGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 1(e) SRI P Y SUNDARESH, S/O LATE P YOGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT CHIKKABANAVARA, NEW EXTENSION, HESSARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 090. Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11546 RSA No. 1778 of 2015 (CAUSE TITLE AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED: 20.03.2025) …APPELLANTS (BY SRI PRASANNA B K, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI GURULINGAPPA, S/O LATE MALLANNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 2. SRI SHANTHANNA, S/O LATE MALLANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT BELGERE VILLAGE, PARASHURAMPURA HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK - 563126. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B M SIDDAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.08.2015 PASSED IN R.A.NO.2/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHALLAKERE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.12.2014 PASSED IN OS.NO.36/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHALLAKERE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11546 RSA No. 1778 of 2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellants has filed a memo for dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn with liberty to file declaratory suit in respect of suit schedule property. 2. Memo is accepted. 3. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32