Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30757 (AP)

G. Vijay Prakash, v. The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue ( Ex - II)

WA/179/2013 · 2025-08-04

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

\ APHC010444842013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 179 AND 268 OF 2013 WRIT APPEAL NO: 179 OF 2013 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order in W.P. No. 28576 of 2012, dated 02.01.2013 on the file of the High Court of A. P. Between: G. Vijay Prakash, S/o. Gopal Rao, Aged about 48 years, Occ; Business, R/o. D.No.9-37-2, Kozo Village, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND 1. The Govt, of Andhra Pradesh Revenue (Ex - II), Department Secretariat, Hyderabad, Reptd. by its Principal Secretary. 2. The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector Guntur District Guntur, - 4. The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent Nandyal, Guntur District. 5. The Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Represented by its Managing Director. Ltd, Hyderabad. ...Respondents/Respondents / lA NO: 1 OF 2013(WAMP 436 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the order passed in Cr.No.3600/2010/CPE/G-2, dt.31.8.2012, pending disposal of the writ appeal. to Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI O. MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI A. SANTHOSH KUMAR APHC010019112013 WRIT APPEAL NO: 268 OF 2013 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal preferred against the order dated 02.01.2013 in WPNo.28110/2012 in the file of the High Court of A.P. Between: K.V.Ramana Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, Aged about 39 years, R/o. D.No.29-161-1, Ward No.17, Tekke, Nandyal, Kurnool district. Licencee of M/s. Jagan Wines. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND 1. The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Kurnool district, Kurnool. 3. The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Nandyal, Kurnool district. 4. Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Limited, IML Depot, Pandipadu, Kurnool District. ...Respondents/Respondents i ^•r lA NO: 2 OF 2013fWAMP 677 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the 3"'^ respondent issued i Rc.No.B/26/201 2, dated 29.08.2012, permitting the 4*^ respondent to open the Shop No.29/184-A-1-1, Tekke, Nandyal, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the writ appeal. lA NO: 3 OF 2013fWAMP 678 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the order passed in Cr.No.3600/2010/CPE/G-2, dated 4.8.2012 and the consequential order of the 3'^^ respondent issued in RC.No.B/26/2012 dated 29.08.2012, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A JAGANNADHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI A. SANTHOSH KUMAR The Court made the following Common Judgment: Bench Sr.Nos:-4 & ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI » APHC010444842013 5 [3483] W.A.Nos.179 & 268 of 2013 W.A.No.179 of 2013:- ...Appellant G. Vijay Prakash Vs. of Pradesh Andhra Government The Revenue (Ex-ll) Department and others ...Respondents ********** Sri O. Manoher Reddy (W.A.No.179 of 2013), Sri A. Jagannadha Rao (W.A.No.268 of 2013) Advocate for Appellants Learned Government Pleader for Excise, Advocate for Respondents Prohibition Sri A. Santhosh Kumar and CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 5th August 2025 PC ; Learned counsel for the appellants state that the matters have been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Appeals are disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. 2. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY, REGISTF^AR //TRUE COPY// SECTI FICER To. 1. The Principal Secretary, Govt, of Andhra Pradesh Revenue (Ex - II), Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Vijayawada. 3. The District Collector Guntur District Guntur. 4. The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent Nandyal, Guntur District. 5. The Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd, Vijayawada. 6. The District Collector, Kurnool district, Kurnool. 7. The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Nandyal, Kurnool district. 8. Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Limited, IML Depot, Pandipadu, Kurnool District. 9. One CC to Sri O. Manoher Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 10.One CC to Sri A. Jagannadha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 11 .One CC to Sri A. Santhosh Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 12.TWO CCs to GP for Prohibition & Excise, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 13.Two CD Copies Cnr ¥ HIGH COURT DATED:05/08/2025 18 AUG 2025 COMMON JUDGMENT WA Nos. 179 and 268 OF . , Current Section . ^ sat- 2013 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEALS AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS