KALPESH KUMAR JAIN, v. GUNAVATHI JAIN, & 2 OTHERS,
CRLRC/1016/2011 · 2025-07-29
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30756 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30756 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010444082011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between:
1. KALPESH KUMAR JAIN,, S/O PUKHRAJ JAIN, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 35, GOVINDAPPANAICHEN STREET, 1ST FLOOR, B/S GEORG TOW, CHENNAI. 1. GUNAVATHI JAIN 2 HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO. 35 KANCHAUMARTHIVARI STREET, RAJAHMUNDRY. 2. PREETH JAIN, S/O KALPESH KUMAR JAIN, BEING MINOR REP. BY R.NO.1, R/O D.NO. 35 STREET, RAJAHMUNDRY. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A. P., AT HYDERABAD. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Crl.R.C., aggrieved by the orders passed by the Family Court Dist. Judge, East Godavari District, at Rajahmundry, in MC.No. 2 of 2010, dt. 11-04-2011. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CRLRCMP 1495 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1016 OF 2011 KALPESH KUMAR JAIN,, S/O PUKHRAJ JAIN, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 35, GOVINDAPPANAICHEN STREET, 1ST FLOOR, B/S GEORG ...PETITIONER AND GUNAVATHI JAIN 2 OTHERS, W/O KALPESH KUMAR JAIN, HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO. 35-2-11, 1ST FLOOR, KANCHAUMARTHIVARI STREET, RAJAHMUNDRY. PREETH JAIN, S/O KALPESH KUMAR JAIN, BEING MINOR REP. BY R.NO.1, R/O D.NO. 35-2-11, 1ST FLOOR, KANCHAUMARTHIVARI STREET, RAJAHMUNDRY. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A. P., AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Crl.R.C., aggrieved by the orders passed by the Family Court - Dist. Judge, East Godavari District, at Rajahmundry, in MC.No. 2 of 2010, dt. 2011(CRLRCMP 1495 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO KALPESH KUMAR JAIN,, S/O PUKHRAJ JAIN, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 35, GOVINDAPPANAICHEN STREET, 1ST FLOOR, B/S GEORG ...PETITIONER OTHERS, W/O KALPESH KUMAR JAIN, 11, 1ST FLOOR, PREETH JAIN, S/O KALPESH KUMAR JAIN, BEING MINOR REP. BY 11, 1ST FLOOR, KANCHAUMARTHIVARI THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.
BY ITS PUBLIC
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this -cum- Addl. Dist. Judge, East Godavari District, at Rajahmundry, in MC.No. 2 of 2010, dt. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed by Family Court-cum- Addl. Dist. Judge, East Godavari District at Rajahmundry in MC.No. 2 of 2010, dt. 11-4-2011 pending disposal of the Crl.R.C., Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
ORDER:-
This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 11.4.2011 passed by the Family-cum- Additional District Judge, East Godavari District at Rajahmundry, in M.C.No.2 of 2010. 2. Heard. Perused the entire material on record. 3. Pursuant to the directions of this Court dated 05.5.2025, notices could not be served to the parties despite best efforts made by the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, East Godavari District at Rajamahendravaram. It seems that parties are not residing in the addresses shown in the Criminal Revision Petition and the petitioner is not showing interest to prosecute the case. The Criminal Revision Case is pending since
2011. As both the parties are not showing interest, this Court is inclined to dismiss the Criminal Revision Case for non-prosecution. 4. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non- prosecutionp. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 30.7.2025 TJN
142 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1016 OF 2011 Dated: 30.7.2025 TJN