Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30754 (AP)

TALLURI VENKATA RAMANA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/23217/2025 · 2025-09-03

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010445052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 23217/2025 Between: 1. TALLURI VENKATA RAMANA, W/O LATE NARSIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, FAIR PTICE SHOP DEALER, FAIR PRICE SHOP NO. 509008, R/O DOOR NO. 13-34,CHINTALAPUDI VILLAGE, CHINTALAPUDI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE SUB COLLECTOR, NUZIVEDU DIVISION, ELURU DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHINTALAPUDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 and 3 in not supplying the essential commodities to the petitioner fair price shop no. 509008, situated in Chintalapudi Village, Chintalapudi Mandal, Eluru District. Without there being any suspension or cancellation of the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of constitution of India consequently direct the respondents no. 2 and 3 to supply essential 2 commodities to the petitioner for fair price shop no. 509008, situated in Chintalapudi Village, Chintalapudi Mandal, Eluru District. And pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the respondents no. 2 and 3 to supply essential commodities to the petitioner for fair price shop no. 509008, situated in Chintalapudi Village, Chintalapudi Mandal, Eluru District.. By enabling him to supply to the card holders pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “….to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 and 3 in not supplying the essential commodities to the petitioner fair price shop no. 509008, situated in Chintalapudi Village, Chintalapudi Mandal, Eluru District. Without there being any suspension or cancellation of the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of constitution of India consequently direct the respondents no. 2 and 3 to supply essential commodities to the petitioner for fair price shop no. 509008, situated in Chintalapudi Village, Chintalapudi Mandal, Eluru District and pass….” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies has furnished a copy of the show cause notice dated 01.09.2025 which was also acknowledged by the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, Ms. Anjanee Priya Jagarlamudi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to challenge the said show cause notice dated 01.09.2025. 4. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the show cause notice issued by the respondents on 01.09.2025. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Date: 04.09.2025 Gss