ATTAR SINGH v. HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS
CWP/5819/2025 · 2025-04-08
Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30752 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30752 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-5819-2025 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-5819-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.04.2025
Attar Singh
.....Petitioner Versus Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR
Present: Mr. Ashish Jhamb, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate,,
for respondent-HSVP.
*** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL)
By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 24.09.2020 (Annexure P-5) passed by the respondents, whereby allotment of plot under the ‘oustee category’ has been rejected.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made several representations, including the representation dated 19.12.2024 (Annexure P-10) to the competent authority for redressal of his grievances, but no AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.28 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-5819-2025 (O&M)
-2- action has been taken thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if the respondent authorities are directed to deal with his concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said representation.
3.
Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana and Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, for respondent-HSVP are present in Court. Learned counsel for respondent-HSVP submits that the said representation shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law.
4.
Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Sector-14, Gurugram (competent authority), to look into the pending representation dated 19.12.2024 (Annexure P-10) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order.
5.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE
(SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 08.04.2025 Ajay Prasher
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.28 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document