Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30751 (ORI)

PRAVAT MALLICK v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/4453/2025 · 2025-09-10

Gourishankar Satapathy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.4453 of 2025 Pravat Mallick … Petitioner Mr. B. Behera, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. M.K. Mohanty, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 10.09.2025 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is an application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Keonjhar Town PS Case No.548 of 2024 arising out of GR Case No.1739 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Keonjhar for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.303(2) and 3(5) of BNS, on the main allegation of committing theft of bike of the informant. 3. Heard, Mr. Bibekananda Behera, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.K. Mohanty, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. 4. Admittedly, the FIR has been registered against unknown person, but the Petitioner is in custody since 11.11.2024 and in the meantime, charge sheet has been submitted. In the aforesaid circumstance and taking into consideration the mode and manner of implication of the present Petitioner, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits the petitioner to bail. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following condition:- (i) the petitioner shall report attendance before the IO once in a fortnight preferably on a Sunday in each month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for three (06) months from the actual date of release from the custody. The IO shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. 7. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge Priyajit