[2025:RJ-JP:38761] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14541/2025 Spml Infra Limited, A Company Incorporated Under The Companies Act, 1956 And An Existing Company Under The Provisions Of The Companies Act, 2013, Having Its Registered Office At 22, Camac Street, Block-A, 3Rd Floor, Kolkata 700016, West Bengal, And At 74A, Rajbhawan Road, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Shalin Jain, Manager. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Janpath, Jaipur -302005. 2. Superintendent Engineer (Npp), Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, 2Nd Floor, Dreamax Plaza, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur-302005. 3. The Chairman (Discoms) Cum First Appellate Authority, Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Janpath, Jaipur-302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Sethi with Mr. Aman Manju For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kartik Seth, through VC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 20/09/2025 The present petition has been filed being aggrieved of the unjust and arbitrary decision and actions taken by the respondents vide impugned purported order dated 25.08.2025, whereby the respondents disqualified the petitioner for the reason “not considered due to poor performance and misrepresentation in previous work assignment of the RVUNL” in the technical [2025:RJ-JP:38761] (2 of 2) [CW-14541/2025] evaluation of bid despite having all requisite qualifications as per terms and conditions of the Tender/Bid of pipul project. Mr. Kartik Seth, has marked presence as caveator and has submitted that the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy available under the RTPP Act, before the First Appellate Authority. It is further submitted that on 23.09.2025, upon the said appeal, hearing has been conducted wherein, respondent has assured the Court that matter will be contested on the date so provided by the concerned Court. In light of the alternate efficacious remedy being available and petitioner has availed the same and date is already fixed in the matter on 23.09.2025, and as per the statement given by the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, this court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petition with directions to Chairman, DISCOM cum First Appellate Authority to adjudicate the appeal after grant of personal hearing on 23.09.2025 at 11.00 AM. It is expected that First Appellate Authority will follow the principles of natural justice and thereafter pass the order, in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed. Pending applications, if any, also disposed of. It is made clear that, till the disposal of the appeal, no work order vis-a-vis the bid shall be issued. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/16