Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30744 (PNJ)

SALIL JINDAL v. HANS RAJ @ PAPPU

CR/1600/2024 · 2025-09-24

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 312-II Salil Jindal Hans Raj @ CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) the Rent Petition No.6 of 2015 titled as “Salil Jindal vs. Hans Raj” pending in before the learned Rent Controller, Bathinda since 2015. writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the vacated the demised shop/premises and handed over the vacant possession of the same to the present civil revision may infructuous. September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1600 Date of decision : Salil Jindal Versus Hans Raj @ Pappu CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Prerna Malhotra, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mona Goyal, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present civil revision is for the Rent Petition No.6 of 2015 titled as “Salil Jindal vs. Hans Raj” pending in before the learned Rent Controller, Bathinda since 2015. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the p writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the vacated the demised shop/premises and handed over the vacant possession of the same to the petitioner/landlord. Accordingly, it is prayed that the present civil revision may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. September 24, 2025 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ivil Revision No.1600 of 2024 (O & M) Date of decision :-24.09.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Prerna Malhotra, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate Prayer in the present civil revision is for speedy disposal of the Rent Petition No.6 of 2015 titled as “Salil Jindal vs. Hans Raj” pending in before the learned Rent Controller, Bathinda since 2015. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the respondent/tenant has vacated the demised shop/premises and handed over the vacant possession /landlord. Accordingly, it is prayed that the be disposed of as having been rendered Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.26 09.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document