Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30741 (JHR)

NITYA NAND SINHA v. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FOUNDRY AND FORGE TECHNOLOGY THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR NIRANJAN KUMAR SINGH

C.Rev./139/2019 · 2025-09-10

Rajesh Shankar

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:27525-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No. 139 of 2019 Nitya Nand Sinha aged about 67 years S/o Late Daya Nand Sinha Resident of Manipura, P.O. & P.S. Patliputra, District Patna Bihar ... ... ... ... Petitioner / Respondent Versus 1. National Institute of Foundry and Forge Technology, Hatia Ranchi through its Director/represented through Niranjan Kumar Singh, Professor I/c Administration, S/o Late Hardeo Singh Resident of Village Korari, P.O. & P.S. Korari, District Patna Bihar … … …. Respondent/appellant/OP 2. Government of India, (Ministry of Human Resources Development and Higher Education) Shastri Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Secretary, (Ministry of Human Resources Development and Department of Higher Education), Government of India, Shastri Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. … … … Performa Respondents/Respondents 4. Chairman, Board of Governor, National Institute of Foundry and Forge Technology, P.O. & P.S. Hatia, Hatia Ranchi. 5. National Institute of Foundry and Forge Technology, P.O. & P.S. Hatia, Hatia Ranchi. … … …. Respondent/appellant/OP --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner/Res : Mr. Sidhhartha Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Shipra Shalini, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, Advocate --------- 05/Dated: 10.09.2025 I.A. No. 2670 of 2022 1) For the reasons stated in the interlocutory application duly supported by the affidavit of the petitioner, the delay of 352 days’ that has crept up in filing the civil review is condoned. 2) I.A. No. 2670 of 2022 stands disposed of. Civil Review No. 139 of 2019 3) There is no error apparent on the face of the records, consequently, the civil review petition is dismissed. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.) NAFR (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Sharda/MM/ Cp.02