Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39614 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2168 of 2025 Applicant :- Mohd. Rehan And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 2. This application under Section 482 BNSS has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 104 of 2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC, Police Station Swar, District Rampur. 3. Counsel for the applicants contends that the applicants were the marginal witness of the sale deed dated 06.12.2021. No amount has been credited in the account of the applicants. The applicants are not the beneficiary of the illicit transaction. During the pendency of investigation, the applicants have been granted protection by this Court vide order dated 26.09.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 7750 of 2022. Investigation has been completed. Charge sheet has been submitted. The applicants had co-operated in the investigation. The applicants have been summoned by the concerned court. No custodial interrogation is required. At this stage there is no credible evidence against the applicants. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. The applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicants are released on anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial, they will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicants, in particular of the fact, that the applicants were the marginal witness of the alleged sale deed, at this stage there is no substantive evidence against the applicants, during the pendency of investigation, the applicants have been granted protection by this Court, charge sheet has been submitted, the applicant had co-operated in the investigation, no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicant Mohd. Rehan and Nakshe Ali involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) the applicants shall make themselves available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport the same shall be deposited by them before the concerned court. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Lbm/- Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad