1 2025:CGHC:28939 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6625 of 2025 1 - Jyoti Singh W/o Ravishankar Singh Aged About 56 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School, Okhar, Block- Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director Education Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - The Block Education Officer Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Verma, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.01 19:44:30 +0530 2 30/06/2025 1. By way of this writ petitions, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents, whereby the petitioner has been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has joined at her transferred place. It is further submitted that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the Rationalization Instructions and the same is arbitrary, as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner, and if the petitioner is not granted relief, she will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner still want to pursue her representation before the concerned authorities to redress her grievances. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioner has been transferred under the Rationalization Instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that, if the petitioner is having any grievance, she may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on her representation, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of 05 days from today, and thereafter, the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of 05 days from the date of receipt of representation, in accordance with law, in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved