M. Prabhakar Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/23287/2025 · 2025-09-03
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30720 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30720 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010444442025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23287/2025 Between:
1. M. PRABHAKAR REDDY,, S/O LATE M. RAMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,RESIDENT OF UPENNALLI VILLAGE, RAMASAMUDRAM MANDAL,ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT.
2. M. BALARAMIREDDY, ,S/O LATE M. RAMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,RESIDENT OF UPENNALLIVILLAGE, RAMASAMUDRAM MANDAL,ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT.
3. M. KUMAR REDDY, ,S/O LATE M. RAMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,RESIDENT OF UPENNALLI VILLAGE, RAMASAMUDRAM MANDAL,ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAYACHOTY,ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT.
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, , MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT.
5. THE SUBINSPECTOR, RAMASAMUDRAM POLICE STATION, RAMASAMUDRAM, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT.
6. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMASAMUDRAM MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT.
7. M ANJAPPA, S/O. M. VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,RESIDING AT D.NO. 2-25, UPPENALLI VILLAGE,H/O. MALENATHAM GRAM PANCHAYAHTH,
RAMASAMUDRAM MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. VUBBARA DUSHYANTH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR REVENUE
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of Respondent No 4 and 5 in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of Petitioners property admeasuring Ac 0 40 cents in Sy no 382/8 situated at Uppenalli Village of Ramasamudram Mandal Annamaiah District in active connivance of Respondent No 7 and further declare the proceedings dated 10 07 2025 issued by the 5th and 6th Respondents as illegal arbitrary and violation of natural justice and infringement of fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the proceedings dated 10 07 2025 issued by the 5th and 6th Respondents by directing the Respondent Nos 4 and 5 not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners property admeasuring Ac 0 40 cents in Sy no 382/8 situated at Uppenalli Village of Ramasamudram Mandal Annamaiah District by setting the aside the proceedings issued by the Respondent Nos 5 and 6”
2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are
directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the respondent No.7. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:04.09.2025 Asr
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.23287 of 2025
Dt.04.09.2025
Asr