IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12738 OF 2012 Between: N.Chandrapaul, S/o.Ramanaiah, Aged about 54 years, E.511444, Driver R/o.Tikkireddypalem village & Post, Pattipadu mandal, Guntur District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The APSRTC, rep.by its Regional Manager, APSRTC Guntur Region,Guntur District 2. The APSRTC rep.by its Dy.Chief Traffic Manager, APSRTC Narsaraopet Division, Narsaraopet,Guntur District 3. The APSRTC rep.by its Depot Manager, APSRTC, Guntur-I Depot, Guntur, Guntur District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the proceedings No.St/19(57)/2009-DYCTM(NRT) dated 21.10.2009 in not granting continuity of service, back wages and attendant benefits to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to grant continuity of service, back wages and attendant benefits to the petitioner. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012rWPMP. NO: 15937 OF 2012) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to grant continuity of service, back wages and attendant benefits to the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A VEERASEKHAR RAO (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K SATYANARAYAN MURTHY (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010444712012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N [3457] WRIT PETITION NO: 12738/2012 Between: N.chandrapaul ...PETITIONER AND The Apsrtc Rep By Its Regional Manager and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.AVEERASEKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SATYANARAYAN MURTHY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following Order; Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N, NAGAMMA assistant registrar OFFICER //TRUE COPY// SBC To, 1. One CC to Sri A Veerasekhar Rao Advocate [OPUC] 2 One CC to Sri K Satyanarayan Murthy (SC for APSRTC) Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:21/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.12738 of 2012 r % X 31 JAN 2025 ^ . Current Section DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS