Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010445032025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 22631 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-13 [3483] Makkena Sekhar Babu ...Petitioner Vs. Central Bank of India ...Respondent ********** Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. D V Sasidhar Advocate for Respondent : --
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 2nd September, 2025 P C :
In view of the availability of an equally efficacious alternative remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal and considering the ratio of the judgments of the Apex Court in Radha Krishan Industries v. State of Himachal Pradesh [(2021) 6 SCC 771] and United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon [(2010) 8 SCC 110], we do not find it a fit case to invoke our extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J Vjl