(1) 47-ca-12618-2024-delay.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12618 OF 2024 IN FAST/29217/2024 THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, PARBHANI VERSUS MOHD. FEROZ ABDUL GANI ... Mr. Akash G. Malipatil h/f Mr. Dnyaneshwar Suresh Bagul, Advocate for Applicant. … CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : 27th FEBRUARY, 2025. P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Bagul, learned Advocate appearing for the applicant. 2. By this application, applicant seeks to condone delay of 265 days caused in filing Appeal. 3. Perused the application. Apparently, delay appears to have been occasioned on account of administrative exigency. The reasons as stated are not controverted by respondents. The applicant has not derived any advantage by making such delay. Hence, case is made out to condone delay. Hence, following order: ORDER a. Civil Application is allowed. b. Delay of 265 days caused in filing Appeal is hereby condoned. c. Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objections, if any. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/February-2025 2025:BHC-AUG:5728