Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:37717 RFA No. 1693 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1693 OF 2023 (MON) BETWEEN:
SRI. KANTEPPA TENGLI, S/O VEERUPAKSHAPPA TENGLI, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCCUPATION-RETIRED GOVT. SERVANT R/O PLOT NO.2, SANTOSH COLONY, DEVI NAGAR, ALAND ROAD, BEHIND CHORGUMBAD, KALABURAGI-585 103 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHANTKUMAR NAGAYYA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
SRI. SRIDHAR DHANASHRI, S/O VEERABHADRAPPA DHANASHRI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCCUPATION- BUSINESS, R/O NO.3, K.G. ROAD, EXTENSION 3RD CROSS, BANGALORE-560 009 …RESPONDENT
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.06.2022 PASSED IN OS.NO.6344/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE LXVI
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2024:KHC:37717 RFA No. 1693 of 2023
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant.
2. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation. Appeal is of the year 2023. Appeal arises out of a money decree. Appeal is filed by the defendant. Till today, process fee is not paid for issue of notice to the respondent, inspite of granting sufficient time. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31