KADIR MIAN ALIAS ABDUL KADIR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./362/2025 · 2025-01-24
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30698 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30698 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 362 of 2025
1. Kadir Mian @ Abdul Kadir, aged about 39 years, Son of Basruddin Mian,
2. Md. Rajas @ Raj Ansari @ Raja Ansari, aged about 22 years, Son Of Md. Abdul Kadir @ Kadir Ansari @ Kadir Mian,
3. Md. Imran @ Md. Imran Ansari, aged about 26 years, Son Of Md. Abdul Kadir @ Kadir Ansari @ Kadir Mian, All are Resident of Village- Kasiyadih, P.O.- Kasiyadih, P.S.- Tandwa, District - Chatra.
… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh , Adv. For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak , Addl.PP
02 / 24.01.2025
Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 137 of 2023 registered under Sections 406, 407, 420, 506, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the three trucks loaded with coal did not reach their destination and the petitioners collected format of the said three trucks and the financer of the trucks seized the trucks while transporting coal. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and there is no independent witness to the occurrence. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 9 of the anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish
sufficient security including cash security hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this
order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Chatra in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 137 of 2023 subject to the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-