JAHID HUSSAIN S/O SABEER HUSSAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/406/2025 · 2025-02-21
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3069 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3069 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8070] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 406/2025 Jahid Hussain S/o Sabeer Hussain, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Nichali Masjid Ke Pass Chhippo Ki Mandi Siswali, Police Station Siswali District Baran (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail Baran). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Buddhi Prakash Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/02/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.178/2024 registered at Police Station Siswali, District Baran for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) of BNS, 2023. Investigation is being contended in this case for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 118(1), 117(2), 61(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since
[2025:RJ-JP:8070] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-406/2025] 21.12.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner also looking to the material available on record in the form of case diary; petitioner is not named in the FIR; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Jahid Hussain S/o Sabeer Hussain shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-506