SHAMBHU PRASAD KAPRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER, SANTHAL PARGANA DIVISION, DUMKA
WPC/793/2025 · 2025-04-17
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30684 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30684 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:11611 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No.793 of 2025
Shambhu Prasad Kapri @ Sambhu Kapri son of Ramsi Mandal Kapri, resident of Village Kasba, Bamankheta, P.O. & P.S. Hansdiha, District Dumka (Jharkhand)
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka, P.O. & P.S. Dumka, District Dumka
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka, P.O. & P.S. Dumka, District Dumka
3. District Land Acquisition Officer, Dumka, P.O. & P.S. Dumka, District Dumka
4. Ramjas Kapri son of Late Narayan Kapri
5. Janardhan Mandal son of Late Makhan Mandal Sl. Nos.4 and 5 both are resident of Village Kasba, P.O. & P.S. Hansdiha, District Dumka (Jharkhand)
.... .... .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Zaid Imam, AC to SC VII
------
Order No.06 / Dated : 17.04.2025
This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent- Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division to expeditiously decide R.M.R. No.90/16-17 which has been filed against the order passed by the Settlement Officer, Santhal Pargana, Dumka in Objection Appeal No.03/2015 whereby the
order passed by the Assistant Settlement Officer, Saraiyahat in Objection Suit No.34/2008 has been upheld.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that the matter involves settlement of a pond in favour of the petitioner against which the objectors have lost case before the Assistant Settlement Officer as well as before Settlement Officer on 06.05.2016.
3. In the revision, order of allotment has been stayed, but the revision has not been disposed of till date.
4. Under the circumstance, Commissioner, Santhal Pargana is directed to dispose of R.M.R. No.90/16-17 within four weeks of the order, failing which the interim order of stay will stand vacated.
Writ petition stands disposed of. Interlocutory Application, if any, is
disposed of.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit