APHC010441482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23327/2025 Between: 1. KUKATLAPALLI PRASAD, S/O ASERVADAM, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC RETD AUDITOR, R/O D.NO 6-345, BANK COLONY, PRAKASH NAGAR. NARSARAOPETA TOWN MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT). 2. KUKATTAPAILI. AMRUTHAKUMARI,, W/O GERA. RAJESWARAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O 12 TH LINE HAHUMAN NAGAR VINUKONDA TOWN MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,THULLURUMANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALANADAU DISTRICT, NARASARAO PETA TOWN AND MANDAL, (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT). 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , NARASARAOPETA SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NARASARAOPETA, PALANADU DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VINUKONDA POLICE STATION, VINUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT). 5. DAMA VENKATESWARLU, S/O NOT KNOW, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC THE THEN TAHSILDAR VINUKONDA, PRESENTLY WORKING AS OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, MANGALAGIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. SHAIK JANI BASHA, , S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCTHE THEN REVENUE INSPECTOR, PRESENTLY WORKING AS REVENUE INSPECTOR, ATCHAMPETA MANDAT, PALNADU DISTRRCT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. TATA SINGAIAH GOUD 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 3rd and 4th respondent in not registering the FIR under sections 3 (f), (g) of Sc and St Atrocities act 1989 r/w under sections 318 (4), 337 and 3 (5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhitha - 2023 (420,466 r/w 34 IPC) against respondents no 5 to 6 and not filed charge sheet basing on the report of petitioner dated 12.05.2025 is illegal, arbitrary violation of the provisions of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha- 2023, besides Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.” 2. Sri Tata Singaiah Goud, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, the names of the Petitioners had been shown as possessors for the last 30 years and suddenly the Revenue Authorities have deleted their names for laying the road. Learned counsel would further submit that the Petitioners have submitted a representation to the Police to register a case against the Revenue Officials. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police to look into the contents of the complaint, and take appropriate action according to governing rules and law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23327 of 2025 Dt.09.09.2025 Dinesh