Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30673 (KAR)

P. N. RAJANNA v. N. TEJAS KUMAR

CCC/1798/2017 · 2025-01-22

K Somashekar, Venkatesh Naik T

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2552-DB CCC No. 1798 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1798 OF 2017 BETWEEN: P. N. RAJANNA S/O LATE NARAYANA REDDY R/O PANATHURU VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI-560087 BENGALURU EAST TALUK. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. P N HARISH - ADVOCATE) AND: N. TEJAS KUMAR TAHASILDHAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK K.R. PURAM BENGALURU 560036. …ACCUSED (BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B G – AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO TAKE THE COGNIZANCE OF THE CONTEMPT COMMITTED BY THE ACCUSED IN NOT OBEYING THE DIRECTION CONTAINED IN THE ORDER DATED 18.04.2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE CORUT IN W.P.NO.15437/2017(KLR) AND DIRECT THE ACCUSED TO Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2552-DB CCC No. 1798 of 2017 ENTER THE KATHA AND PAHANI OF THE LAND IN SY.NO.97 MEASURING 1 ACRE 30 GUNTAS OF PANATHURU VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK IN THE NAME OF THE COMPLAINANT. THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR FRAMING OF CHARGES, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR) This contempt proceeding is initiated by the complainant against respondent/accused for willful disobedience of the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.15437/2017 (KLR) dated 18.04.2017 as per Annexure-A. Learned AGA Smt Namitha Mahesh B.G who is present is directed to accept notice for respondent/accused. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2552-DB CCC No. 1798 of 2017 Learned counsel Sri P.N.Harish for the complainant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the contempt proceedings. Therefore, the memo is taken on record. In terms of the said memo, the present contempt proceedings is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE SD/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE RJ