Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30672 (RAJ)

PUSHPA D/O SHRI BISHAN DAYAL, W/O SHRI SUNIL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16777/2023 · 2025-01-03

Sameer Jain

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:299] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16777/2023 Pushpa D/o Shri Bishan Dayal, W/o Shri Sunil Kumar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Mahapalwas, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj) 2. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.) 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Chairman/ Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. District Education Officer (H.q.), Secondary Education, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mehla Ms. Sunita Mehla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC Ms. Sara Parveen for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 03/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by Coordinate Bench of the Court in Aman Kumari Vs. State of Raj. titled as SBCWP No. 7512/2022, wherein respondents were directed to consider the candidature of the candidates who were on similar footing as that of present petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:299] (2 of 2) [CW-16777/2023] Considering the akin controversy, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the present writ petition be decided in light of the Aman Kumari (supra). Learned counsel for the respondents are not able to refute the afore-cited judgment and the same being of akin factual matrix. Considering the facts and circumstances of the instant matter, and considering the prayer so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this court deems it apposite to allow the present petition in light of the order passed in Aman Kumari (supra). Accordingly, the present petition stands allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /211