AMIR ANSARI ALIAS AMIR KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./8066/2024 · 2025-01-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30671 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30671 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.8066 of 2024
------
Amir Ansari @ Amir Khan .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Shabnum Khatoon
.... .... .... Opposite Parties
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Syed Tafazzul Sajid, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl. P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 09-01-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1622 of 2023 instituted under Sections 498A, 379, 452, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the husband of the complainant/opposite party No.2, treated her with cruelty in connection with demand of dowry of Rs.2,00,000/-. It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that because of marital discord between the parties, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that as the complainant does not want to live with the petitioner, hence, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and to keep and maintain the opposite party No.2 with full honour and dignity as his lawful wife as and when she resumes conjugal life with him. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory
bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.25,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Garhwa in connection with Complaint Case No.1622 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and he will keep and maintain the opposite party No.2 with full honour and dignity as his lawful wife as and when she resumes conjugal life with him and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/