SAI INDUSTRIES v. Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited,
WP/21258/2019 · 2025-06-23
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30671 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30671 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010441462019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 7 TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 21258 OF 2019 Between: M/s.Sai Industries, A proprietary concern. Rep. by its Proprietor, Smt. D. Anitha, W/o. Sri.D. Bose, aged 48 years. Having its office at Plot No. 236 Phase II, B.N.Reddy Nagar, Cherlapally, Hyderabad - 500 051,State of Telangana ...Petitioner AND
1. Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Represented by its Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, APIIC Towers, Plot No.1, IT Park, Mangalagiri, Guntur District - 522503. 2. The Zonal manager APIIC Limited, Industrial Park, MG Road (Auto Nagar), Vijayawada - 520007. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Principal Secretary to Government, Industries Infrastructure and Investment, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Andhra Pradesh- 522503. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ direction or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the proceedings issued by the second Respondent in Lr.No.23169/APIICA/JA/MIP/Mallavalli/ P.No.19/7, dt. 21.09.2019 cancelling the allotment of P.No.19/7 made to the petitioner by forfeiting the EMD paid with the application and further directing that the land cost deposited shall be refunded as per Allotment Regulations as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in gross violation of the principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the letter and spirit of the Regulations framed by the first Respondent and further direct the Respondents to issue final allotment letter and register the sale agreement by considering the letters dt.17.10.2019 and 24.10.2019 made to the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in terms of the letter and spirit of the regulations framed by the 1®* Respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by Second Respondent in cancelling the allotment Lr.No.23169/API 1C/ VJA/M1P/ Mallavalli/P.No.19/7, dt. 21.09.2019 and all further proceedings including the allotment of the above plot to third parties pending the above writ petition. in lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Between:
1.
Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, (APIIC), Having its corporate office at APIIC Towers, Plot No.1, IT Park, Mangalagiri, Guntur District - 522503., Represented by its Vice-Chairman and Managing Director. 2. The Zonal Manager l/c, APIIC Limited, Having its Zonal Office at Industrial Park, MG Road (Auto Nagar), Vijayawada - 520007. ...Petitioners/Respondents 1 & 2 AND
1. Sai Industries, A proprietary concern, Rep. by its Proprietor, Smt. D. Anitha, W/o. Sri.D. Bose, aged 48 years. Having its office at Plot No. 236, Phase II, B.N.Reddy Nagar, Cherlapally, Hyderabad - 500 051,State of Telangana ...Respondent/WritPetitioner
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Principal Secretary, Industries Infrastructure and Investment, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Andhra Pradesh- 522503. ...Respondent/Respondent No.3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the interim order dated 31-12-2019 passed in WP.No.21258 of 2019. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RENU CHAKRAVARTHY KANADAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : SRI J. UGRANARASIMHA, SC FOR APIIC Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : GP FOR INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE The Court made the following: ORDER
7 APHC010441462019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 21258/2019 Between; 1.SAI INDUSTRIES. A PROPRIETARY CONCERN PROPRIETOR, SMT. D. ANITHA, W/0. SRI.D. BOSE, AGED 48 YEARS, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PLOT NO. B.N.REDDY NAGAR, CHERLAPALLY, HYDERABAD - 500 051,STATE OF TELANGANA REP. BY ITS 236, PHASE II, ...PETITIONER AND
1. ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, APIIC TOWERS, PLOT N0.1, IT PARK, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503. 2.THE ZONAL MANAGER APIIC LIMITED, INDUSTRIAL PARK, MG ROAD (AUTO NAGAR), VIJAYAWADA - 520007.
3.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE AND INVESTMENT VELAGAPUDI. ANDHRA PRADESH- 522503 INDUSTRIES A.P. SECRETARIAT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ direction or order more particularly one in the nature Qf writ of mandamus, declaring the proceedings issued by the second
forfey the HMD paid with the application a"'!iT s deposited shall be refunded as per Alim directing that the lane arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in aross *7®" Regulations as being illegal justice and also violative of Artfcll i^ anaTo ofna^,' contrary to the letter and s« T I of Respondent and further direct the Resoo7d^7®"'^''°"^ '^e fir=, and register the sale agreement hv r- ^ ‘° 'eaue final allotment 24.10.2019 made to the Re7pll“r'"®"®9 'C'ers dt.17.10 2019 sp.nt of the regulations framed by the 1sf°RespTndfnr '®”®^ dt. by lAJ^: 1 OF ?niQ P6tition undsr SGction 1^1 PDn '•n the affidavit filed in support of tL pST M-' kcircumstances stated suspend the proceedings issued by Second R ® '’® allotment in Lr.No.23169/APIir/ Respondent i 21.09.2019 and all further plot to third parties in proc d- ^^aiiavaiii/P.;Tr9';7® proceedings including the allntmAm pending the above writ petition dt. of the above jAJlO: 1 OF 9090 Petition under Section 151 ppp In the affidavit filed in support of the '® "’® “''ounisfances stated To Vacate the interim oX da, d P'-^ 2019 and pass 01-12-2019 passed in WP.No.21258 of Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.RENU Counsel for the chakravarthy kanadam Respondent(S):
1GP FOR industries COMMERCE (AP) 2.J ugranarasimha The Court made the following order; In pursuance of letter dated 23.06.2025 addressed to the Registrar seeks permission to withdraw (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioner the present writ petition. 3
2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VENU GOPAL RAO ASSISTANT R^^QISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. One CC to Sri Renu Chakravarthy Kanadam
2. Two CCs to GP for Industries at Amaravati [OUT]
3. One CC to Sri J. Ugranarasimha
4. Two CD Copies , Advocate [OPUC] Commerce, High Court of Andhra Pradesh SCforAPIIC [OPUC] Cnr
■K ■■ HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER WP 21258/2019 5 17 SEP 2025 5 ^ . Current Section DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS