218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11757-2025 Date of Decision:- 18.08.2025 Manish ....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate, Ms. Meghna Nehra, Advocate and Mr. Rajat Singh, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Viney Saini, AAG, Haryana. ***** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time when learned counsel for petitioner realized that he will not get favourable order, he states that he does not want to pursue the present regular bail petition in FIR No.845 dated 27.10.2024, under Section 308(2), 351(3), 123 of BNS 2023 and Sections 4, 6, 17 of POCSO Act, 2012 (Section 4 of POCSO Act was deleted later on and Section 123 of BNS 2023, Section 6 of POCSO, Act were added later on), registered at Police Station Sector 58, Faridabad, District Faridabad and accordingly withdraws the same. 2. In view of the statement, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly as well. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 18.08.2025 Sunil devi Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUNIL DEVI 2025.08.20 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document