SRI S A SATYANARAYANA v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
WP/19873/2025 · 2025-07-08
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30664 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30664 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24691 WP No. 19873 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 19873 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI S.A. SATYANARAYANA S/O LATE S. APPAJAIAH AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, RESIDING AT SADAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562 110. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA-561 203.
2.
THE TAHSILDAR DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, DODDABALLAPURA-561 203.
3.
SRI. VENUGOPAL S R S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT SADAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562 110.
4.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
DEVANAHALLI.
(R4 CAUSE TITLE AMENDED VIDE COURT
ORDER DATED 8.7.2025) …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24691 WP No. 19873 of 2025
(BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA FOR R1, R2 & R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
ORDER DATED 16.06.2025 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN R.A./DEV-75/2023 IS PRODUCED AS ANNXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents No.1, 2 and 4.
2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the petitioner is assailing the order dated 16.06.2025 passed by the respondent No.1 (Annexure-A).
3. Heard Sri S.Kalyan Basavaraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Siddharth Babu Rao, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents - State.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24691 WP No. 19873 of 2025
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel Sri S.Kalyan Basavaraj by referring to Annexure-H that the petitioner herein has filed a revision petition under Section 136 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and an application has been filed before the said authority for seeking stay of the impugned order in the present writ petition. However, the said application is yet to be considered by the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Rural District at Devanahalli.
5. In that view of the matter, taking into
consideration the petitioner herein is having an efficacious remedy before the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Rural District at Devanahalli and has the said revision petition is already preferred before the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Rural District at Devanahalli (Annexure-H) along with an application for stay, the said authority is directed to consider the interim application made by the petitioner herein at the earliest within one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Till the consideration of the
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24691 WP No. 19873 of 2025
said application by the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Rural District at Devanahalli, there shall be stay on the implementation of the order passed by the respondent No.1 in R.A.No.75/2023.
With these observations, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
KLY