M/S. KALEESUWARI OIL STORE v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(CT)
WP/6888/2012 · 2025-09-01
C Saravanan, S M Subramaniam
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30662 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30662 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.Nos.6888 & 7585 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.Nos.6888 & 7585 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2012 and W.M.P.No.22795 of 2019 W.P.No.6888 of 2012 M/s.Kaleesuwari Oil Store, Rep. by its Proprietrix, No.1, Kalingarayan Mudali Street, Chennai – 600 021. ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Washermanpet II Assessment Circle, Chennai. ... Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent in proceedings in TNGST / 1280123 / 2006-07, quash the notice dated 28.02.2012 issued therein. W.P.No.7585 of 2012 M/s.Kaleesuwari Refinery Private Limited https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.6888 & 7585 of 2012 No.64, Telugu Chetty Street, Chennai – 600 021. ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Washermanpet II Assessment Circle, Chennai. ... Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent in proceedings in TNGST / 33391280956 / 2006-07, quash the notice dated 28.02.2012 issued therein. In Both Petitions For Petitioner(s) : Mr.C.Subramanian for Mr.B.Raveendran For Respondent(s) : M/s.Amirtha Dinakaran, Government Advocate C O M M O N O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) These writ petitions have been filed challenging the notice dated
28.02.2012. 2. A perusal of the notice reveals that the Assistant Commissioner https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.6888 & 7585 of 2012 had arrived at a proposal and issued the impugned show cause notice to afford an opportunity to the writ petitioners. The writ petitioners, instead of filing an objection on the proposal, have instituted the present writ petitions. 3. No writ against a show cause notice is maintainable unless such notice has been issued by an incompetent authority having no jurisdiction, or tainted with the allegations of mala fides. In all other circumstances, the noticee is expected to submit objections, if any, to the competent authority for effective disposal of the issues raised in the show cause notice. 4. Granting liberty to the writ petitioners to submit its objections, if any, the present writ petitions stand disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
(S.M.S.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 01.09.2025 skr (1/2) Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No To https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.6888 & 7585 of 2012 The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Washermanpet II Assessment Circle, Chennai. Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.6888 & 7585 of 2012 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and C.SARAVANAN
, J.
skr W.P.Nos.6888 & 7585 of 2012 01.09.2025 (1/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis