Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30662 (AP)

GADE SUBHADRA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/22762/2025 · 2025-08-28

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010443052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22762/2025 Between: 1. GADE SUBHADRA, W/O.G.V.R.MOHANA RAO, D.NO.10-1-8, MW ROYAL PALACE, FLAT NO. 101, WALTAIR UP LANDS, VISAKHAPATNAM-530003. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. REGISTRAR OF CHITS, ANDHRA PRADESH, 3. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CHITS/ ARBITRATOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. M/S MARGAARSI CHIT FUND PVT LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of Respondent No. 3 in (i) failing to afford the Petitioner a reasonable opportunity of being heard, and (ii) failing to intimate either the date of disposal or the fact of disposal of the proceedings, thereby depriving the Petitioner of her statutory right to prefer an appeal before Respondent No. 1 under Section 70 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the impugned order dated 29.08.2024 passed in Dispute No. 196/2023 by Respondent No. 4 and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 29.08.2024 passed by Respondent No. 3 in Dispute No. 196/2023, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AVULA AKASH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 22762 of 2025 ORDER: Sri Avula Akash, learned counsel for the petitioner on record, seeks permissions of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition and to grant liberty to file fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 29.08.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO W.P.No. 22762 OF 2025 Date: 29.08.2025 SPP