[2025:RJ-JP:37939] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14271/2025 1. Nepal Singh S/o Narayan Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Guradiya Kalan, Tehsil Pachpahad, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. 2. Gopal Singh S/o Bhuwan Singh, R/o Village Guradiya Kalan, Tehsil Pachpahad, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies Secretariat, Jaipur. (Raj). 2. The District Collector (Supply), Jhalawar (Raj). 3. The District Supply Officer, Jhalawar (Raj). ----Respondents With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14274/2025 1. Kamlesh Kumar S/o Premnarayan, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Chandipur, Tehsil Manohar Thana, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. 2. Gorilal S/o Ramnath, R/o Village Chandipur, Tehsil Manohar Thana, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The District Collector (Supply), Jhalawar (Raj.) 3. The District Supply Officer, Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14415/2025 Girdhari Lal Purviya S/o Late Shri Satyanarayan Purviya, Aged About 47 Years, R/o- Gram Panchayat Rajwas, Tehsil Lawan, [2025:RJ-JP:37939] (2 of 4) [CW-14271/2025] District Dausa (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. District Collector (Supply), Dausa (Raj.) 3. District Supply Officer, Dausa (Raj.) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14426/2025 Kamal Singh S/o Late Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- Village Panchayat Satukheda, Tehsil Tadgarh, District Beawar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food Civil Supply And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. District Collector (Supply), Beawar (Raj.) 3. District Supply Officer, Beawar (Raj.) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14446/2025 1. Banwari Lal Sharma Son Of Shri Mahadev Prasad, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Didwana, Tehsil Lalsot, Dist. Dausa (Raj). 2. Manohar Lal Phoolwaria Son Of Shri Rewadmal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Didwana, Tehsil Lalsot, Dist. Dausa (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food And Civil Supply And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. [2025:RJ-JP:37939] (3 of 4) [CW-14271/2025] 2. District Collector (Supply), Dausa (Raj). 3. District Supply Officer, Dausa (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Yadav Mr. Shashi Bhushan Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.GC with Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 17/09/2025 1. The present petitions pertain to allotment of fair price shop. The competent authority is stated to be concerned District Collector or any officer authorised by him. 2. Learned counsel Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.G.C., has taken a preliminary objection that the matters primarily pertains to policy and there are different factual disputes which can be addressed before the competent authority. However, learned counsel is agreeable to the fact that the contentions or grievances of the petitioners herein can be heard within a period of 15 days by the competent authority i.e. District Collector. It is submitted that after giving due audience and considering the representation of the petitioners, appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 3. In light of the submissions made by learned counsel, this Court deems it proper to dispose of these petitions with a direction that the petitioners or aggrieved parties mark their appearance before the concerned District Collector as per the recommendation of Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa Committee (more specifically in [2025:RJ-JP:37939] (4 of 4) [CW-14271/2025] para-19 of the said report) on 13.10.2025 at and around 11:00 am and after giving due audience, speaking order will be passed by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the allotment of the shop qua the disputed site will be kept in abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to either of the sides. 5. These petitions are accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. 6. Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioners, if they are aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/63-64, s-133, s-135-136