223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6768-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.08.2025 Jagdish Chander ... Petitioner Vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate and Ms. Santosh Malik, Advocate for the respondents-Nigam. ******* HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. Present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari seeking quashing of action of the respondents in not granting pay scale of the post of SDO/AGM for the period from 09.12.2006 to 05.08.2015, on his re-allocation from the post of JE-I, vide order dated 09.12.2006 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents-Nigam, at the very outset, very fairly submits that the grievance raised by the petitioner in the present VISHNU 2025.08.12 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CWP-6768-2019 (O&M) -2- petition has substantially been redressed. The claim of the petitioner stands accepted and payment has already been released. As such, nothing survives in the present petition. 3. In view of the above, instant petition is disposed of as infructuous. [ HARPREET SINGH BRAR ] 12.08.2025 JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VISHNU 2025.08.12 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh