IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 678 of 2025 1. Faridan Khatoon, aged about 55 years, D/o Late Sekh Alauddin, W/o Ibrahim Ansari, R/o Vill-Barwey, P.O&P.S- Ormanjhi Dist- Ranchi. 2. Rahidan Khatoon @ Rahida Khatoon aged about 60 years, D/o Late Sekh Alauddin, W/o Md. Rafique Anasari, R/o Vill- Ratwe, Karma, P.O&P.S- Ramgarh, Dist- Ramgarh … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. Md. Shamim Akhtar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha , Addl.PP 02 / 30.01.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.100 of 2024 registered under sections 406/ 420/467/468/471/34 of the Indian Penal Code.. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the co-accused persons namely Ahmad Ali, Md.Taslim Ansari and Samsul Ansari fraudulently induced the informant to deliver Rs.1,30,00,000/- and the only allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners have executed a power of attorney in favour of Samsul Ansari and thereafter Samsul Ansari got the sale deed registered in favour of the informant and when the informant enquired about the same, the informant found that the land has been sold to someone else. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and there is no allegation of entrustment of any money to the petitioners nor there is any allegation against the petitioner of cheating or dishonestly inducing anybody. It is then submitted that there is no allegation against the petitioners of committing any forgery and the main allegation is against the co-accused persons namely Ahmad Ali, Md.Taslim Ansari and Samsul Ansari. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and co-accused with similar allegations have already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 17.01.2025 passed in ABA no. 51 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Ranchi in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.100 of 2024 subject to the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-