NAMBURI VENKATA HARI KRISHNAM RAJU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/22446/2025 · 2025-09-14
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30648 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30648 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010441952025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 22446/2025 Between:
1. NAMBURI VENKATA HARI KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O VENKATA MARRAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O POTHUMARRU VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, ELURU DISRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST.
2. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KALIDINDI GRAMAPANCHAYAT, KALIDINDI KALIDINDI MANDAL, ELURU DIST.
3. THE KALIDINDI GRAMAPANCHAYAT, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, KALIDINDI KALIDINDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT.
4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU.
5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KAIKALURU RURAL CIRCLE, KAIKALURU, ELURU DISTRICT.
6. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALIDINDI POLICE STATION , KALIDINDI, ELURU DIST.
7. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT.
8. THE TAHSILDAR, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KALIDINDI, ELURU
2
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not considering the Representation dated 14.08.2025 of the petitioners is as illegal, arbitrary , contrary to law and violation of Article 14 and 16 of constitution of India and further direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 14.8.2025 of the petitioner forth with and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.8.2025 forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. GP FOR HOME
3. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 22446/2025
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted a representation dated 14.08.2025 to the 2nd respondent herein requesting not to grant any permission for installation of Lord Ganesha idols at the petitioner’s subject property on the eve of Ganesh Chaturthi on 27.08.2025. Pending the Writ Petition, festival completed and no permission was granted for installation/establishment of any idols of Lord Ganesha at the subject place of the petitioner. Therefore, no further orders are necessary and the Writ Petition becomes infructuous.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 1155..0099..22002255 TTPPSS
4
89
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO:22446 of 2025 1155..0099..22002255 TTPPSS