[2025:RJ-JP:39606] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14783/2025 Sangeeta Chaturvedi D/o Shri Narayan Chaturvedi, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Patan Wala Bagh, In Front Of Ramdwara, Karauli. At Present Working As Teacher Grade III Level-2 (Hindi) In Government Senior Secondary School, Asthal, Block And District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Educa- tion Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner. 4. District Education Officer, Head Quarter, Secondary Edu- cation, Karauli. 5. District Education Officer, Head Quarter, Elementary Edu- cation, Karauli. 6. Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Asthal, Block And District Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 25/09/2025 1. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his clients, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; she is permitted to file a representation before respondent No.4 - The District Education Officer, Head Quarter, Secondary Education, Karauli, encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition within a period of four (04) weeks from today; and if a direction is issued to respondent No.4 to decide the same in a time-bound manner in light of the judgment passed by a Single [2025:RJ-JP:39606] (2 of 2) [CW-14783/2025] Bench of this Court, at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, in the matter of Mahesh Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Rajashtan & Ors.1. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.4 - The District Education Officer, Head Quarter, Secondary Education, Karauli, within a period of four (04) weeks from today. Respondent No.4 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of filing of such representation in light of the judgment passed in Mahesh Kumar Sharma (supra), by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner's grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 5. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 6. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/34 1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14952/2021, decided on 27.10.2021