Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30646 (PAT)

Sundarvati Devi v. The Presiding Officer, Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (LARRA)

MJC/971/2024 · 2025-07-11

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.971 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8097 of 2019 ====================================================== 1. Sundarvati Devi Wife of Late Raj Kishor Narayan Ray, resident of Village- Darba, Police Station-Tajpur (Halai O.P.), District-Samastipur. 2. Saroj Kumar Ray, Son of Late Raj Kishor Narayan Ray, resident of Village- Darba, Police Station-Tajpur (Halai O.P.), District-Samastipur. 3. Satish Kumar Ray, son of Late Raj Kishor Narayan Ray, resident of Village- Darba, Police Station-Tajpur (Halai O.P.), District-Samastipur. 4. Pintu Kumar Ray, son of Late Raj Kishor Narayan Ray, resident of Village- Darba, Police Station-Tajpur (Halai O.P.), District-Samastipur. ... ... Petitioners Versus 1. The Presiding Officer, Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (LARRA) Darbhanga. 2. Yogendra Singh, District Magistrate, Samastipur, District at Samastipur. 3. Sanjeev Kumar Kapar, The District Landa Acquisition Officer, Samastipur District at Samastipur. 4. Vishnu dev Mandal, The District Panchayati Raj Officer Samastipur, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10 11-07-2025 Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the order passed by the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (LARRA) in appropriate proceeding including writ jurisdiction. 2. Limitation, if any, in filing the proceeding Patna High Court MJC No.971 of 2024(10) dt.11-07-2025 2/2 shall be considered by the authority concerned in view of the fact that the matter has been pending in this Court in contempt proceeding. 3. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this contempt petition is disposed of as withdrawn. pawan/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U